Contact Details

Rm. N-411, House of Representatives, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines
+63 2 931 5497, +63 2 931 5001 local 7370

Rep. Edcel C. Lagman

Mobile No. 0916-6406737 / 0918-9120137

21 September 2011

 

         

          Minority Leader Edcel C. Lagman lauded today the eight women lawmakers comprising the newly launched “Soul Sisters” for RH for their “remarkable courage and unwavering determination in pushing for the passage of a reproductive health law.”

 

          Lagman says he is not surprised at the commitment and daring shown by his women colleagues. “I have always believed that a pro-woman measure like the RH bill will have no dearth of women supporters,” the Albay solon declared. 

 

          “The ‘Soul Sisters’ will not only be a breath of fresh air in the RH debates. These strong and accomplished women will be indispensable to the imminent passage of the RH bill into law,” Lagman added.

           Representatives Kimi Cojuangco, Sandy Ocampo, Josephine Lacson-Noel, Abigail Faye Ferriol, Bernadette Herrera-Dy, Emily Aglipay, Sharon Garin and Janet Garin compose the “Soul Sisters”.

            Lagman also stated that “the Church can continue on its mission to save souls but the State, with the help of the Soul Sisters and other RH advocates in the Congress, must pursue unhampered a program which reduces maternal and infant mortality in the secular realm.”

 

Lagman underscored that House Bill No. 4244 or the proposed “Responsible Parenthood, Reproductive Health and Population and Development Act” will promote maternal and infant health even as it will help prevent the deaths of thousands of mothers and babies annually.

 

In the Philippines, 11 mothers die daily and the lifetime risk of maternal death in the country is 1 in 140, compared to 1 in 8,000 for women in developed countries. RH advocates maintain that universal access to reproductive health information and services will help improve overall health while it will also ultimately help reduce poverty.

 

          Studies by the WHO, UNDP and UNFPA confirm that correct and consistent use of contraceptives will prevent one-third of all maternal deaths. Lagman explained that family planning will have a direct effect on maternal mortality by reducing the number of high-risk pregnancies. “Family planning will help women who are at a higher risk of maternal death avoid unplanned pregnancies,” he said.

 

          Lagman also stressed that the RH bill will prevent maternal deaths by improving access to both basic and emergency obstetric care and skilled assistance at birth.

 

          According to the WHO, four out of five maternal deaths are the direct result of obstetric complications, most of which could be averted through delivery with a skilled birth attendant and access to emergency obstetric care.

 

He added that the RH bill will also most definitely help lower the incidence of abortion by preventing unplanned, mistimed and unwanted pregnancies which are the ones being terminated through induced abortion. Moreover, he said that research by the Allan Guttmacher Institute shows that contraceptive use reduces abortion rates by 85%.

 

According to the WHO and the medical journal Lancet, about 90 per cent of worldwide abortion-related deaths and disabilities could be avoided if women who wanted effective contraception had access to it.

  • Rep. Edcel C. Lagman
  • Tel No. 4155455
  • Mobile No. 0916-6406737 / 0918-9120137
  • 19 September 2011

  

              No Malacañang-sponsored budgetary outlay is sacrosanct as to be spared from the scalpel which the Congress ought to wield to independently exercise its ascendant power over appropriations.

 

               The “small committee” of the House of Representatives which was constituted to consider individual amendments from Representatives must have enough courage and will to repel the importuning of the Executive of wrestling control from the legislature in the enactment of the General Appropriations Act (GAA).

 

               It borders on condescension for administration officials and allies to insist that Congress must maintain intact the President’s pet triumvirate allocations for Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT), counterpart funding for Public Private Partnership (PPP) and the Miscellaneous Personnel Benefits Fund (MPBF) which includes the sequestered funds for unfilled positions in the Judiciary, Congress and Constitutional Commissions.

 

               The 2012 CCT budget has inordinately ballooned to P39.4 billion from the current P21.1 billion or an increase of 86%. This huge escalation is being pursued in the absence of an impact assessment study on the effectivity of CCT as a component of the poverty alleviation agenda and despite nationwide complaints of flawed implementation.

 

                The proposed P22.1 billion PPP government counterpart is 76.8% higher than the 2011 allocation of P12.5 billion despite anemic implementation with no project having been bid out after 15 months.

 

                 The impoundment of the funds for unfilled positions, which were previously appropriated in the separate budgets of co-equal bodies and Constitutional Commissions enjoying fiscal autonomy, violates the Constitution.

 

                 The President’s NEP is not cast on stone and is not untouchable by the Congress.

 

                  Neither is the NEP a perfect formulation of budgetary priorities and allocations nor a magnum opus of unparalleled excellence which cannot be amended, modified and realigned by the Congress.

 

                 The challenge to the “small committee”, which is composed of Appropriations Chairman Joseph Emilio A. Abaya, Senior Vice Chairman Jocelyn S. Limkaichong, Vice Chairman Rolando G. Andaya, Jr. (former DBM Secretary), Deputy Majority Leader Rodolfo Fariñas, and Minority Leader Edcel C. Lagman, is to adopt amendments upholding the supremacy of Congress over the enactment of the national budget.

  • Office of the Minority Leader Edcel C. Lagman
  • 931-5576 / 932-5412
  • (0916)640-6737
  • 13 September 2011

  

            As the principal petitioner assailing the constitutionality of the cancellation of the ARMM elections and the grant of authority to the President to appoint Officers-in-Charge under the challenged Republic Act No. 10153, I laud the Supreme Court for restraining the appointments of OICs pending final adjudication of the petition.

 

            The Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) obligates the respondents, representing the President, to observe “judicial courtesy” and not to pre-empt the final decision of the Supreme Court by extending precipitate appointments to OICs.

 

            Under existing statutes on ARMM, the prohibition on the appointments of OICs will not result to a hiatus in public service because the elected incumbents will hold-over pending the election and qualification of their successors.